<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Cloud Costs on rtnpro</title><link>https://rtnpro.com/tags/Cloud-Costs/</link><description>Recent content in Cloud Costs on rtnpro</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rtnpro.com/tags/Cloud-Costs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>We Priced Out 'Just Use a PaaS' at Scale. Here's Where It Breaks.</title><link>https://rtnpro.com/post/2026-07-16-priced-out-paas-at-scale/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://rtnpro.com/post/2026-07-16-priced-out-paas-at-scale/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week I argued that mid-market platform teams are stuck between two roads — build an internal platform you can&amp;rsquo;t staff, or rent a PaaS you outgrow. A few people pushed back on the second road: &lt;em&gt;is renting really that bad? The DX is incredible and the bill is tiny.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They&amp;rsquo;re right, for a while. So this post is the honest version of the rent-it math. Not &amp;ldquo;PaaS is bad&amp;rdquo; — it isn&amp;rsquo;t — but &lt;em&gt;where the curve bends&lt;/em&gt;, and why the bend catches teams by surprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>